<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Tap • Bee Stripes]]></title><description><![CDATA[The flow of work with startups]]></description><link>https://tap.beestripes.studio</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:39:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tap.beestripes.studio/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[Bee Stripes]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[beestripes@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[beestripes@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Bee Stripes]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Bee Stripes]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[beestripes@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[beestripes@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Bee Stripes]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[Employees, your bootstrapped scaleup needs agitators]]></title><description><![CDATA[How to help your founder get to $100M]]></description><link>https://tap.beestripes.studio/p/employees-your-bootstrapped-scaleup</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://tap.beestripes.studio/p/employees-your-bootstrapped-scaleup</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elise Chant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:23:44 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!HrTn!,w_256,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2d1cb9e1-6069-4950-8303-f206f9834eae_1280x1280.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>You work for a pay-check?&nbsp;</h3><p></p><p><strong>Look around</strong> &#8212; your team is made up of <em>employees</em> and <em>owners (agitators)</em>.&nbsp;</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;owner&#8221; referred to from here, not in the sense of &#8220;financial owner&#8221;, but a work-ethic like an owner.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>The ecosystem:</p><p>  &#8226; Large groups need more <em>employees.</em></p><p>  &#8226; Small groups need <em>owners.</em></p><p>Those to serve the direction, and those to serve <em>and</em> <em>examine</em> it.</p><p>  &#8226; Small groups in large groups need owners <em>&#8230;think</em> the exec team.</p><p></p><h4>In any work setting, you won&#8217;t avoid hiring both (unless you hire intentionally)</h4><p></p><p>Typically, owners like to experiment, while employees fear change.</p><p>Owners operate like founders, but are without the capital (for better or worse!). Ideally they are invested through ESOP. </p><p>Change and scale are hand-in-hand - because scale is not infinite, so you&#8217;ll continue to run in to change problems.</p><p></p><h4><strong>Are you an owner or an employee?</strong> </h4><p></p><p>In a science analogy: heated matter moves between solid &#8594; liquid &#8594; gas.</p><p>Phase change requires agitating - energy, momentum, persistence.</p><p>Intrinsically in this process, particles collide to push and expand to something new &#8212; a great visualisation of change.&nbsp;</p><p>However, not everyone likes change.. so to defend &#8220;fear of change&#8221;, the owner-archetype needs to be a good judge of fit and timing.</p><p>A thinking tool that has made this less seismic, has been &#8220;small bets&#8221;. Allowing owners to explore ideas in less noisy ways: agitating slowly, trying new things, seeing what sticks. Constructive change agency is not simply disrupt for disruption&#8217;s sake.&nbsp;</p><p></p><h4>How can you enable change-makers? </h4><p></p><p>As places that constantly need to experiment to find fit &#8230;without agitation&#8230; how else can a scaleup push to $100M???</p><blockquote><p>I found it most bizarre recently to learn of a redundancy blitz at a scaleup that let go of their entire Growth team &#8212; a natural habitat of <em>owners</em>.</p><p><em>Looking around</em> - the founder was a bootstrapped founder.</p><p>&#10067; Are bootstrapped founders less likely to promote owner-mindset - for fear of making <em>themselves</em> redundant.</p><p>&#10067; How will that scaleup make it to $100M?</p></blockquote><p>Existential risk and accountability risk can be channelled as agitators. Sometimes the dark art of bringing on a VC can be useful in this regard.</p><p>Since it's easier to scale things that already work than find traction on new ideas - the challenge of starting-up - scaleups need <em>owners</em> in spades.</p><p>A lever to acceleration (to change) is owner-mindset.</p><div class="pullquote"><p><strong>Simple Radical Idea: <br>To bring about change, you need agitators.</strong> </p></div><p>Please go out and embrace difference, permit yourself to gamble with people who&#8217;s views you don&#8217;t immediately agree with. Hire constructive mindsets that agitate yours and make space for them. Give it time.</p><p>Reward the owner-mindset &#8230;but don&#8217;t shout loudly about it, because you need the employees to drive it home.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>